Allahabad High Court Orders Security for Haseen Khan
The Allahabad High Court has mandated 24/7 armed security for Haseen Khan following an incident where he was allegedly stopped from offering Namaz inside his private residence. The court’s decision comes in response to a petition filed by Tarik Khan, which sought permission for religious gatherings during Ramadan.
In a significant ruling, the court directed that two armed guards accompany Haseen Khan wherever he goes until further notice. Justice Atul Sreedharan emphasized, “Any incident of violence that afflicts him or his property shall be prima facie understood to have occurred at the instance of the State.” This statement underscores the court’s commitment to protecting individual rights against potential state overreach.
The controversy traces back to January 16, 2026, when Haseen Khan alleged that he was detained by police while praying at home with family members. He claimed he was coerced into signing a document he could not read due to illiteracy, raising concerns about the treatment of individuals during religious practices.
On January 27, 2026, the court had previously issued contempt notices to Bareilly District Magistrate Avinash Singh and Senior Superintendent of Police Anurag Arya for their interference in the prayer activities. The court’s latest order reiterates that no prior state permission is required for religious gatherings within private property, provided they do not extend into public spaces.
The court has summoned both Avinash Singh and Anurag Arya to appear in person on March 23, 2026, with the warning that failure to comply could result in non-bailable warrants being issued. The matter has been listed for final orders on the same date at 2:00 PM, indicating that the court is taking the issue seriously.
Observers note that this case highlights ongoing tensions between individual religious freedoms and state authority in India. The Allahabad High Court’s ruling is seen as a crucial step in upholding constitutional rights while holding authorities accountable for their actions.
As the situation develops, further details remain unconfirmed regarding the implications of the court’s orders and the responses from the local authorities involved. The upcoming hearing on March 23 will be pivotal in determining the next steps in this case.
